Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228350›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Organ Preservation in Esophageal Cancer: Current Strategies, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Wenyi Liu, Baihua Zhang, Chunguang Wang, Xin Yu, Longde Du, Zhentao Yu, Mingqiang Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenyi LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5921-4674
Baihua ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Chunguang WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Xin YuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Longde DuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Zhentao YuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, China.
Mingqiang KangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.

Funding

Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen SZSM202211011Shenzhen High-level Hospital Construction Fundthe National Cancer Center Climbing Fund NCC201918A01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal cancer (EC) continues to pose a major global health burden, ranking as the ninth most common malignancy and sixth leading cause of cancer mortality, with over 600,000 new cases and 500,000 deaths annually as of 2025. While esophagectomy has long been the standard for curative intent in resectable disease, organ preservation strategies have advanced significantly, offering viable alternatives for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or those unsuitable for surgery due to comorbidities. These approaches encompass definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by active surveillance ("watch-and-wait"), and innovative integrations of immunotherapy and targeted therapies. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from recent clinical trials, systematic reviews, and international guidelines up to 2025, demonstrating that organ-sparing protocols can achieve comparable overall survival (OS) rates-often exceeding 50% at 5 years in selected cohorts-while substantially enhancing quality of life (QoL) by preserving esophageal function. For instance, the SANO trial (2025) confirmed non-inferiority of active surveillance post-nCRT, with 2-year OS of 74% versus 71% for standard surgery. Key challenges include imprecise response assessment, locoregional recurrences (20-30%), and treatment-related toxicities such as esophageal strictures. Emerging trials like ESOSTRATE and PALACE3 are evaluating immunotherapy-enhanced regimens, potentially expanding organ preservation to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). With genomic biomarkers and novel modalities like proton therapy, personalized organ preservation promises to broaden applicability, reduce morbidity, and improve outcomes across histological subtypes. Additionally, recent studies emphasize the role of liquid biopsies, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in monitoring treatment response and guiding surveillance, potentially reducing the need for invasive procedures and improving detection of minimal residual disease. The aim of this review is not only to summarize recent trials but to synthesize them into an operational framework that clinicians and researchers can apply: a decision algorithm for selecting organ preservation candidates. This is the novel element that distinguishes this work from prior narrative reviews.

Indexed as

active surveillancebiomarkerschemoradiotherapyclinical trialsesophageal adenocarcinomaesophageal canceresophageal squamous cell carcinomaimmunotherapyorgan preservationproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID41228350
PMCPMC12606734

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.