Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228358›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Best Practices and Communication Strategies for Informing Oncology Patients About Treatment Discontinuation and Transition to Palliative Care-A Practical Guide for Oncologists.

Aleksandra Piórek, Adam Płużański, Dariusz M Kowalski, Maciej Krzakowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aleksandra PiórekDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumors, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Adam PłużańskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumors, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-6445
Dariusz M KowalskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumors, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-3229
Maciej KrzakowskiDepartment of Lung Cancer and Thoracic Tumors, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-0900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discontinuing active oncological treatment and initiating palliative care is a critical moment in cancer care, requiring oncologists to address complex clinical, ethical, and emotional challenges. This narrative review aims to provide clinicians with practical guidance for conducting conversations about treatment discontinuation and transitioning patients to palliative or hospice care. Drawing from current clinical guidelines, empirical research, and expert perspectives, the article reviews evidence-based communication strategies and frameworks, including the SPIKES protocol, Ask-Tell-Ask, the WHO model, and the disclosure model. The article also explores the clinical, functional, psychosocial, and ethical criteria relevant to treatment withdrawal decisions, as well as the timing and structure of end-of-life discussions. A practical algorithm is proposed, synthesizing key principles into a step-by-step guide for use in daily oncology practice. The algorithm supports clinicians in balancing medical indications with patient values and preferences, fostering shared decision-making and maintaining therapeutic relationships even in the most difficult circumstances. The review concludes that structured yet flexible communication enhances patient understanding, reduces unnecessary interventions, and improves the quality of end-of-life care. By promoting patient-centered care and timely palliative integration, this article offers oncologists a clear and adaptable approach to one of the most sensitive aspects of cancer care.

Indexed as

advance care planningbreaking bad newsoncology communicationpalliative carepatient–physician relationshiptreatment discontinuation

Identifiers

PMID41228358
PMCPMC12608836

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.