Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228624›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Calibration Framework for Modeling Nonlinear Viscoelastic-Plastic Behavior of Bioresorbable Polymers in Finite Element Analysis for Stent Applications.

Nicklas Fiedler, Thomas Kleine, Stefan Oschatz, Selina Schultz, Niels Grabow, Kerstin Lebahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicklas FiedlerInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Rostock, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4436-7010
Thomas KleineInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Rostock, 18119 Rostock, Germany.
Stefan OschatzInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Rostock, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2339-456X
Selina SchultzInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Rostock, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-0524-7955
Niels GrabowInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Rostock, 18119 Rostock, Germany.
Kerstin LebahnInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Rostock, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1304-1066

Funding

Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt 03ZZ0921ABundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt 03ZZ0922GBundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt 03ZZ0931ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 501988175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is common in biomedical engineering for combining design and material development, with model validation crucial for accurate prediction of material behavior. Simplified geometries are commonly needed in stent development due to high effort in prototype manufacturing. This study outlines a methodology for FEA validation related to stent development-related FEA validation using injection-molded planar 2D substructures from a stent design with two types of polymers: poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) and poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate) (PGA-co-TMC). Specimens underwent quasi-static and cyclic testing, including loading, stress relaxation, unloading, and strain recovery. The material model coefficients for FEA were calibrated for three different constitutive models: linear elastic-plastic (LEP), Parallel Rheological Framework (PRF), and Three-Network (TN) model. The validation of planar stent segment expansion (PSSE) showed strong agreement with the experiments in deformation patterns, with varying force-displacement responses. The PRF and TN models provided better fits for behavioral predictions, with the PRF model being especially favorable for PLLA, while all models exhibited limitations for PGA-co-TMC. This study proposes a robust approach for the material modeling in stent development, enabling efficient material screening and stent design optimization through a simplified 2D validation setup. Material model accuracy depends strongly on calibration-load case congruence, while phenomenological approaches (PRF) show enhanced model robustness against load case variations compared to physically coupled models (TN).

Indexed as

FEAnumerical simulationpolymer-based biomaterialpolymer stentviscoelastic material modelviscoplastic material model

Identifiers

PMID41228624
PMCPMC12608888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.