Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228764›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Fall Detection in Elderly People: A Systematic Review of Ambient Assisted Living and Smart Home-Related Technology Performance.

Philippe Gorce, Julien Jacquier-Bret

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philippe GorceUniversity of Toulon, CS60584, Cedex 9, 83041 Toulon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-8443
Julien Jacquier-BretUniversity of Toulon, CS60584, Cedex 9, 83041 Toulon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2815-1700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fall detection systems in ambient assisted living (AAL) and smart homes are essential for the comfort, safety, and autonomy of elderly people. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of these systems considering categories of sensors and methods used. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Seven open databases were screened without a date limit: PubMed/MedLine, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Science.gov, Academia, IEEE Xplore, and Mendeley. The article selection and data extraction were performed by two authors independently. Among the 473 unique records, 80 studies were selected. Five fall detection performance parameters (accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score) and two computation speed parameters (training and testing time) were extracted and classified according to three sensor categories (wearable, non-wearable, and hybrid solutions), and four methods (deep learning, machine learning, threshold, and all others). The ANOVA results showed that wearable sensors performed the worst in fall detection. Deep learning methods produced the best results for the five parameters. Identifying the advantages of different solutions is a major challenge for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers in the design and implementation of more effective fall detection systems.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAssisted Living FacilitiesMonitoring, AmbulatoryAgedHumansMachine LearningWearable Electronic DevicesAALaccuracyelderlyF1-scorefall detectionprecisionsensitivitysmart homespecificitywearable and non-wearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID41228764
PMCPMC12609574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.