ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Coal Mine Disaster Risks: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable Event-Driven Multisensor Risk-Evolution Analysis for Methane Early Warning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Task-Aware Low-Light Image Enhancement Method for Underground Coal Mine Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The production environments of coal mines are inherently complex, with interrelated disaster risks that challenge safety management. Current prediction systems struggle with fragmented data, limited mechanistic understanding, and inadequate early warnings, falling short of modern coal mine safety needs. This paper advances the thesis that artificial intelligence, including machine learning, deep learning, and Large Language Model, provides essential tools for overcoming these prediction challenges in coal mining. We review AI-based approaches for forecasting coal and gas outbursts, mine fires, water disasters, roof collapses, and dust disasters, analyzing them through technical principles, application scenarios, and empirical outcomes. The analysis clarifies how AI improves risk prediction accuracy, enhances data integration, and enables smarter decision-making for safety. By examining the five major hazards, we highlight ongoing challenges in AI implementation and outline pathways for future development, emphasizing the importance of large models and autonomous agents. Our findings support the creation of advanced AI-driven safety and early warning systems for coal mines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.