Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228809›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Coal Mine Disaster Risks: A Review.

Peiyan Lu, Yingjie Liu, Yuntao Liang, Dawei Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peiyan LuChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7011-7171
Yingjie LiuChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.
Yuntao LiangChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.
Dawei CuiChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China U23B2094the Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund Special Project of Tiandi Science & Technology Co.,Ltd 2024-TD-ZD023-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production environments of coal mines are inherently complex, with interrelated disaster risks that challenge safety management. Current prediction systems struggle with fragmented data, limited mechanistic understanding, and inadequate early warnings, falling short of modern coal mine safety needs. This paper advances the thesis that artificial intelligence, including machine learning, deep learning, and Large Language Model, provides essential tools for overcoming these prediction challenges in coal mining. We review AI-based approaches for forecasting coal and gas outbursts, mine fires, water disasters, roof collapses, and dust disasters, analyzing them through technical principles, application scenarios, and empirical outcomes. The analysis clarifies how AI improves risk prediction accuracy, enhances data integration, and enables smarter decision-making for safety. By examining the five major hazards, we highlight ongoing challenges in AI implementation and outline pathways for future development, emphasizing the importance of large models and autonomous agents. Our findings support the creation of advanced AI-driven safety and early warning systems for coal mines.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecoal mine disasterforecasting modelmachine learningrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41228809
PMCPMC12608180

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.