Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41228829›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine Learning-Driven E-Nose-Based Diabetes Detection: Sensor Selection and Feature Reduction Study.

Yavuz Selim Taspinar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yavuz Selim TaspinarDepartment of Mechatronic Engineering, Selcuk University, Konya 42130, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7278-4241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a major global health problem, with a rapidly increasing prevalence and long-term health complications in both developed and developing countries. If not diagnosed early, it can lead to cardiovascular diseases, kidney failure, vision loss, and nervous system disorders. This study aimed to classify individuals with diabetes or healthy individuals using e-nose sensor data obtained from breath samples taken from 1000 individuals. Six sensor features and one class feature were used in the analysis. Machine learning methods included Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Decision Trees (DT), Gradient Boosting (GB), Naive Bayes (NB), and AdaBoost (AB). ANOVA and Information Gain analyses were conducted to determine the effectiveness of the sensor data, and the TGS2610 and TGS2611 sensors were found to be critical for classification. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) reduced data size and saved processing time. Experimental results showed that the ANN model provided the most successful classification, with 100% accuracy. AB and GB achieved 99.8% accuracy, while NB achieved 97.6% accuracy. Dimensionality reduction using PCA optimized training and testing times without loss of accuracy. The study presents a data-driven approach to e-nose-based diabetes detection, demonstrates the comparative performance of the models, and highlights the importance of sensor selection and data size optimization.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesDiabetes MellitusElectronic NoseMachine LearningAdultAlgorithmsBayes TheoremDecision TreesFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerPrincipal Component Analysiselectronic nosefeature analysisfeature reductionmachine learningrank analysis

Identifiers

PMID41228829
PMCPMC12608253

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.