ArticleSmall methods2025
BMDx2: A Tool for Integrating Toxicogenomics-Based Dose-Dependency Analysis and AOP-Based Mechanistic Insights.
Article in Small methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- AOP-Based Analysis of Curated Transcriptomic Data Reveals a Context-Dependent Core Mechanism of PFAS-Induced Liver Steatosis.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- New approach methodologies for next-generation risk assessment of nanomaterials and nano-enabled products.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Review on Predictive Models and Integration Strategies for Holistic Impact Assessment of Chemicals and Materials.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- ARACRA: Automated RNA-seq Analysis for Chemical Risk Assessment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Cardiotoxicity adverse outcome pathway network: towards mechanistic and quantitative modelling.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- BMDx2: A Tool for Integrating Toxicogenomics-Based Dose-Dependency Analysis and AOP-Based Mechanistic Insights.Small methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the advent of mechanistic toxicology using omics data to link molecular perturbations with systemic outcomes, regulatory toxicology still lacks the application of mechanism-anchored metrics from such data. This is partially because traditional gene-centric analysis often falls short of linking molecular changes to adverse outcomes. To address this gap, BMDx2, an open-source tool that transforms multi-dose toxicogenomics datasets into quantitative, mechanistic evidence for human chemical safety assessment is developed. BMDx2 couples benchmark-dose modeling with Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) enrichment to derive transcriptomic-based points of departure, enabling potency ranking, chemical prioritization, and mechanistically anchored explanations of the effect of chemical exposures. BMDx2 can process a broad range of data, including DNA microarray and RNA sequencing studies. Here, case studies are used to illustrate the versatility of BMDx2 in characterizing the mechanism of action of chemicals. An initial case study on carbon nanotubes exposure applies integrative analysis of transcriptomics and genome-wide DNA methylation data, uncovering cellular reprogramming processes underlying fibrosis. A second case study on bleomycin exposure demonstrate how transcriptomic data alone can be mapped to fibrosis-related AOPs in a standardized, regulatory appropriate manner. Together, these examples show how BMDx2 supports the regulatory application of toxicogenomics and accelerates mechanism-based chemical safety evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.