ArticlePhysiological reports2025
A pilot study on midazolam sedation for murine echocardiography: A potential alternative to isoflurane anesthesia and awake imaging.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A pilot study on midazolam sedation for murine echocardiography: A potential alternative to isoflurane anesthesia and awake imaging.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Isoflurane anesthesia is often used to facilitate murine echocardiography, but can suppress cardiac function. Awake imaging avoids pharmacological interference, but can induce sympathetic activation. In this Midazolam sedation. Parameters were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA. Midazolam enabled imaging without overt stress behavior. Compared to midazolam, heart rate was similar under isoflurane and higher while awake (p ≤ 0.01). End-systolic volume was larger under isoflurane and smaller while awake; stroke volumes remained similar across conditions. Global longitudinal and circumferential strain were less negative under isoflurane (p = 0.03) but similar during awake imaging, while radial strain was higher during awake imaging. Peak longitudinal strain rate was less negative under isoflurane (p ≤ 0.01) and more negative while awake (p = 0.05). Early diastolic strain rate was similar under isoflurane and lower while awake (p = 0.02). In conclusion, cardiac function was most depressed under isoflurane and most enhanced during awake imaging, likely stress-driven. Murine echocardiography under midazolam sedation was feasible, yielding better function than isoflurane anesthesia, closer to awake imaging but without overt handling stress. These findings require further validation across disease models, sexes, and strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.