Evidence mapPaperPMID 41229539Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Preoperative prognostic nutritional index as a predictive factor for postoperative pneumonia in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

Chen Chen, Chenglin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, Jiangsu, China.
Chenglin LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) remains a serious complication following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (EC) patients, contributing to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. This study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) could be an independent predictor of POP in EC patients. Methods: This study included 200 EC patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2021 to December 2022. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the predictive ability of preoperative PNI for POP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for POP among EC patients. A predictive nomogram model was conducted. The performance of the nomogram model was evaluated by the AUC curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Two hundred EC patients receiving esophagectomy were included finally, and 73 (36.5%) cases developed POP. ROC curve analysis showed that preoperative PNI predicted the occurrence of POP with an AUC value of 0.602 at a cut-off value of 49.6; the sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index was 64.38%, 63.78%, 0.2716, respectively. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that male, aged ≥60 years old, TNM stage III, tumor location, hospital stay time >16 days, WBC counts >5.62 × 10 Conclusion: Preoperative PNI is a significant predictive factor for the occurrence of POP in EC patients. The nomogram model incorporating preoperative PNI shows good accuracy and clinical practicality in predicting the occurrence of POP among EC patients.

Indexed as

esophageal cancernomogram modelpredictive factorsprognostic nutritional indexrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41229539
PMCPMC12602213

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.