ReviewFrontiers in aging2025
Research progress on risk prediction models of physical restraint in the elderly: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review presents the advancements in research on risk prediction models for physical restraint among the elderly. As the global population ages, the issue of physical restraint in older adults has become increasingly prominent, making accurate risk prediction essential for enhancing their quality of life. Current Status: Physical restraint rates exhibit marked regional disparities (e.g., 84.9% in Spain vs. 1.9% in the US). Key risk factors include age ≥75, dementia, and agitation. Machine learning models achieve higher accuracy than traditional statistical approaches, but hybrid models better balance precision and interpretability. Future Directions: (1) Developing real-time monitoring systems via sensor technology; (2) Establishing ethical frameworks for model deployment through clinician-data scientist partnerships; (3) Implementing validated tools in clinical settings to minimize restraint use. Finally, the review emphasizing the need for improved methodologies and the integration of interdisciplinary approaches to better address this complex issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.