ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Strategies for Pancreatic Cancer-Responsive Nanodrug Platforms Targeting Tumor Hypoxic Environments.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal immunomodulation with programmable biomaterials to promote musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Review
- Molecular Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-Based Biomaterials in Cancer Research: From Mechanistic Insights to Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Targeted drug delivery systems for pancreatic cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Chemoresistance in the era of immunotherapy: challenges and novel combinatorial strategies for digestive system tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: The Future Direction for the Treatment of Tumors.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies, largely because of its profoundly hypoxic and desmoplastic tumor microenvironment (TME), which hinders drug delivery and promotes resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Hypoxia not only serves as a therapeutic barrier, but also presents a selective vulnerability that can be exploited by smart nanocarriers. This review highlights recent advances in hypoxia-responsive nanoparticle (NP) platforms designed to overcome these barriers through four key strategies: (1) hypoxia-triggered drug release using bioreductively cleavable linkers and hypoxia-activated prodrugs; (2) surface functionalization with tumor-targeting ligands, such as aptamers and antibodies; (3) selective activation of hypoxia-activated prodrugs that become cytotoxic only under low oxygen conditions; and (4) multi-stimuli-responsive designs integrating pH, enzymatic, or exogenous triggers. Preclinical studies in PDAC models have demonstrated that these systems can achieve over two-fold tumor growth inhibition and a 60% increase in intratumoral necrosis compared with controls, validating their in vivo therapeutic potential. Furthermore, the recent integration of artificial intelligence into NP design has accelerated the optimization of hypoxia-responsive systems by enabling the rapid identification of structure-function relationships and in silico prediction of tumor-specific accumulation. Collectively, these strategies offer a promising route toward more effective, selective, and personalized nanomedicines for pancreatic cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.