ReviewIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
A Scoping Review of the Effect of Intermittent Fasting on Diabetes Regulation and Weight Control.
Review in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What Works in Type 2 Diabetes: Intermittent Fasting or Calorie Restriction or Both?Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intermittent fasting (IF) has emerged as a popular dietary approach that has gained popularity among individuals concerned with weight and diabetes control. This scoping review evaluated the effects of IF on glycaemic control and weight reduction by analysing various IF protocols. Methods: A scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Medline databases were searched (2019-2024) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The primary outcomes were the effectiveness of IF on glycaemic control, measured by changes in fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin sensitivity, and HbA1c. The secondary outcomes assessed the impact of IF on weight management. Results: The scoping review identified improvements in FBG levels and insulin sensitivity among individuals practicing IF, with HbA1c reductions observed in multiple studies. Weight loss and favourable changes in body composition have consistently been reported. The ethnic inequalities, particularly for South Asians, were also reported, revealing gaps in geographical evidence and proposing population-specific IF interventions. However, adherence challenges and adverse effects, such as hunger, fatigue, and irritability, were noted, highlighting the need for personalised IF protocols. Variability in outcomes due to individual factors such as age, gender, and baseline metabolic health was evident. Conclusion: IF is a promising strategy for glycaemic control and sustainable weight management in patients with diabetes mellitus. Despite its benefits, individualisation and medical supervision are crucial for addressing compliance issues and minimizing risks. The ethnic and cultural factors must be considered in ongoing clinical care and future IF research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.