Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229805›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the vaccinated: a cross-sectional survey.

Mengyuan Chen, Xiang Xue, Faguang Luo, Yongba Chen, Wenfeng Zhan, Jian Shuai, Dan Xu, Bo Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mengyuan Chen *Department of General Practice, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang Xue *Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Faguang Luo *Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yongba ChenGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Wenfeng ZhanDepartment of General Practice, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian ShuaiDepartment of General Practice, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dan XuGeneral Practice Research and International Collaboration, Curtin Medical School/Curtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Bo LvDepartment of General Practice, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines play a crucial role in preventing serious complications, including intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital admissions, and in reducing the symptoms associated with the infection. However, vaccine hesitancy has been identified as a significant barrier to COVID-19 vaccination. This survey aimed to investigate vaccine hesitancy by exploring and identifying the enablers and barriers to receiving the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in a small cohort who had already received a first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 959 individuals who received a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, from February 18 to February 23, 2021. The survey investigated the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants, and the enablers and barriers to the COVID-19 vaccination. Results: In total, 959 individuals completed the survey. The participants had an average age of 43.23±9.86 years, and 80.0% were male, 84.8% were married, and 34.9% had additional private commercial insurance. In terms of vaccine complications, 11.5% reported mild allergic reactions, and 8.7% reported hypertension. Among the participants, 74.7% agreed to receive a second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the participants who received the first dose of the vaccine revealed a higher level of vaccine acceptance among males [odds ratio (OR) =0.58; P=0.005], older individuals (OR =0.97; P=0.001), those who were married (OR =0.57; P=0.007), those with additional private commercial insurance (OR =0.65; P=0.02), and those who had many colleagues and friends who had received the vaccine (OR =0.58; P=0.007). Conversely, those who misunderstood the safety profile and side effects of the vaccine (OR =4.34; P<0.001) and those who misunderstood the data on the adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccine (OR =1.59; P=0.03) were less likely to receive the vaccine. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was lower among males, older individuals, those who were married, those with additional private commercial insurance, and those who had a number of supportive colleagues and friends who had received the vaccine. Misunderstandings of the safety profile of the vaccine and the related adverse events were associated with a higher rate of vaccine hesitancy. Education efforts should seek to reduce vaccine hesitancy by improving understandings of the safety profile and adverse events related to the COVID-19 vaccine, emphasizing the benefit-to-risk ratio both at the individual level and from a socioeconomic perspective. Reducing vaccine hesitancy will increase the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine, which in turn will reduce morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization, including ICU and critical care admission, thus decreasing the social and economic burden.

Indexed as

Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination (COVID-19 vaccination)COVID-19 educationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41229805
PMCPMC12603467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.