ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
What is the optimal dose of N-acetylcysteine in adult patients with bronchiectasis?-data from the RIBRON registry.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bronchiectasis in Older Adults: Distinctive Epidemiology, Etiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Evolution Compared with Younger Populations.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Antioxidants as Therapeutic Tools in the Management of COPD: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- N-acetylcysteine: evidence based consensus document on the therapeutic advantages in respiratory diseases (NECTAR).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bronchiectasis is characterized by excessive respiratory secretions, the management of which is clinically significant. Among the available pharmacological treatments, mucolytics play a pivotal role. N-acetylcysteine (N-AC) is the most commonly used mucolytic; however, the optimal dosing regimen remains inadequately defined. The primary aim of the present study is to specifically evaluate the efficacy of 1,200 mg/day of N-AC compared to 600 mg/day in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, observational, multi-center study conducted across 43 centers, involving a cohort of 2,461 adult patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis based on a stable clinical state receiving either 600 mg/day of N-AC (n=252) or 1,200 mg/day (n=116), and provided follow-up data were available for 2 years. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Final outcomes were further adjusted for additional clinically relevant variables. Intergroup differences in intra-group changes were analyzed using a Poisson test. Results: Following PSM, the 1,200 mg/day N-AC group (n=104) demonstrated a statistically significant, fully adjusted reduction in exacerbations (-48.6%, P=0.01), hospitalizations (-29.9%, P=0.038), and total exacerbation rates (-54.1%, P=0.002), compared to the 600 mg/day group (n=219). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with more than 20 cc/day of sputum volume and those with mucopurulent sputum decreased by 24.3% (P=0.001) and 8.5% (P=0.041), respectively, in the 1,200 mg/day group versus the 600 mg/day group. No statistically significant difference was observed in the rate of Conclusions: N-AC at a dose of 1,200 mg/day is more effective than 600 mg/day in reducing exacerbations, hospitalizations, and daily sputum volume in patients with bronchiectasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.