Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41229877›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

The efficacy of azvudine in treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a retrospective single-center cohort analysis.

Hong Lei, Ya-Wen Ye, Yue-Juan Zhou, Yan-Fei Mao, Yu Fang, Pei-Pei Chen, Wen-Wen You, Shu Li, Yan-Yan Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hong Lei *Department of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.
Ya-Wen Ye *School of Pharmacy, Wenzhou Medicine University, Wenzhou, China.
Yue-Juan ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.
Yan-Fei MaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.
Yu FangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.
Pei-Pei ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.
Wen-Wen YouDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.
Shu LiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.
Yan-Yan XuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medicine University (Lishui Central Hospital), Lishui, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-0848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is no longer classified as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to undergo genetic mutations, leading to persistent public health challenges. It is still necessary to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of existing clinical drug treatments. In this study, we mainly evaluate the treatment effect of azvudine in the real world of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from December 1, 2022, to October 31, 2023. Patients receiving azvudine were categorized as the treatment group, while those without antiviral therapy constituted the control group. The primary endpoint was the rate of composite outcome of disease progression within a 38-day observation period. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the rate of receiving ventilator-assisted ventilation. Results: Of 939 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 260 were included in the final analysis after exclusions and propensity score matching (1:1), with 130 in each group. In the azvudine group, only one patient required invasive ventilation, was admitted to ICU, and ultimately passed away. In the matched control group, the rate of the composite outcome of disease progression was 9.23% (12/130), the all-cause mortality was 5.38% (7/130), the incidence of ICU admission was 5.38% (7/130), and the incidence of receiving ventilator-assisted ventilation was 6.15% (8/130). The treatment of azvudine showed a significant reduction in the endpoints, including the rate of the composite outcome of disease progression (P=0.02) and receiving ventilator-assisted ventilation (P=0.047). Azvudine was linked to a lower combined risk of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR): 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01 to 0.62] and ventilator-assisted ventilation needs (HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.97). It reduced the risk of composite outcome of disease progression [absolute risk reduction (ARR): 0.08, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.15; number needed to treat (NNT): 12, 95% CI: 7 to 50]. Conclusions: The findings show that azvudine is effective in treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients. It could be considered for therapeutic use in this patient population.

Indexed as

all-cause mortalityazvudinecomposite outcomeCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Identifiers

PMID41229877
PMCPMC12603486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.