ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2025
Pharmacist-Led Assessment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Hospitalized Patients.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pharmacist-led framework for antibiotic-associated liver injury: from pharmacovigilance signals to bedside surveillance with the updated RUCAM and susceptibility markers.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Indicators of Quality Care-What We Do Matters.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important but underdiagnosed adverse drug reaction in hospitalized patients. The complexity of diagnosis, under-reporting, and a lack of standardized assessment tools contribute to underestimation of its prevalence. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of DILI in a tertiary care hospital and to discuss the role of clinical pharmacists in using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) to detect, assess, and manage DILI. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients who were admitted between January and June 2022 to a tertiary care hospital in Porto Alegre, Brazil. All hospitalized patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at least 3 times the upper limit of normal at any point during the hospital stay were screened. Suspected cases of DILI were evaluated by trained pharmacists using the RUCAM. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Of 56 014 patients admitted to the hospital during the study period, 1274 had elevated ALT, of whom 38 were classified by the RUCAM as having DILI. Among these, 33 (87%) experienced development of DILI during the hospital stay. Most of the patients ( Conclusions: DILI remains under-recognized and under-reported in hospital settings. This study reinforces the potential role of clinical pharmacists in active surveillance using RUCAM and highlights the need for institutional strategies prioritizing the monitoring of liver function in high-risk patients, particularly on general wards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.