ArticleRSC advances2025
Evaluating the regenerative capacity of biosynthesized nano formulated 3D scaffolds in scald burn healing.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severely burned patients require effective regenerative measures to overcome barrier defects and risk of infection. The aim of the investigation was to evaluate the regenerative capacity of DPMSCs (dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells) presented in the form of nanomaterial-enriched scaffolds for tissue regeneration. These injuries specifically need proper wound repair because third and fourth-degree burns cut deep into tissues. Regenerative solutions through mesenchymal stem cells appear very promising for tissue reconstitution. However, tissue engineering has a significant difficulty in improving cell survival and retention in target tissues since direct transplantation cannot achieve these outcomes due to low cell retention rates and cell redistribution into other organs. Therefore, the study focuses on recent advances in developing injectable hydrogels, designed to address these limitations as a three-dimensional cell culturing matrix with increased water absorption capacity
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.