ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2025
Adapting measurable residual disease evaluation to clinical practice for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Updates of CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute leukemia: 2026 edition.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) has become a critical biomarker in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), particularly for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The incorporation of MRD-directed strategies into clinical practice can enable personalized therapy and improve outcomes in ALL patients. Growing evidence has demonstrated that MRD status not only reflects the treatment response and relapse risk but also informs clinical decisions across the transplant continuum, including transplant indications, donor selection, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant interventions. With the advent of highly sensitive technologies such as real-time polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing, MRD assessment has reached unprecedented accuracy, enabling precision medicine for ALL. This review systematically addresses six key clinical questions related to the application of MRD in ALL patients undergoing transplantation. We discuss optimal MRD detection methods, timing and sampling strategies, the prognostic implications of MRD positivity or clearance, and MRD-directed approaches before and after allo-HSCT. We further highlight emerging immunotherapeutic options and research gaps that must be addressed to refine MRD-guided strategies. In summary, incorporating MRD evaluation into routine clinical practice has the potential to optimize transplant outcomes and reduce relapse in ALL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.