ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2025
HBV reactivation and its metabolomic profile after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review Article: Biomarkers in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Towards Precision Medicine.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Comparison of patients with HBV-related HCC with and without MASLD after liver transplantation.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The role of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear, and the metabolic differences between patients with NASH and those with HBV reactivation are also yet to be elucidated. This study is to investigate the impact of NASH on HBV reactivation risk and prognosis following liver transplantation for HCC, and to develop a predictive model and identify therapeutic targets. Methods: This study included 274 patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC. The HBV reactivation status of patients with NASH was analyzed, and the metabolic characteristics of peripheral blood were examined to compare NASH and non-NASH patients with or without HBV reactivation. Results: The HBV reactivation free survival was better in non-NASH patients (P<0.0001). Furthermore, NASH patients with HBV reactivation had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) than non-NASH patients with HBV reactivation (P=0.016). In contrast, the RFS of NASH patients without HBV reactivation was comparable to that of non-NASH patients without HBV reactivation (P=0.810). Subsequently, we constructed a model to predict HBV reactivation by incorporating 7 clinical indicators using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-Cox (LASSO-Cox) approach. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values for predictions at 500, 1,000, and 1,500 d were 0.759, 0.809, and 0.814, respectively. Finally, metabolic pathway analysis identified key pathways involved in HBV reactivation, and glutamine was found to be an independent protective factor against HBV reactivation following liver transplantation for HCC. Conclusions: NASH patients are more prone to HBV reactivation following liver transplantation for HCC and exhibit worse recurrence-free survival. Glutamine may serve as a potential therapeutic target or predictive biomarker for HBV reactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.