Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230360›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025

The Psychopathological Domains of Attachment Trauma: A Commentary.

Frank M Corrigan, Hannah Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank M CorriganTrauma Psychotherapy Scotland, 13 Fitzroy Place, Glasgow, Scotland, G3 7RW.
Hannah YoungDundee Psychotherapy, The Flour Mill, Dundee, Scotland, DD1 3EJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution by Farina & Schimmenti (2025) highlights the impact of childhood maltreatment on adult health. Deep Brain Reorienting (DBR), a neurophenomenological approach, proposes that attachment traumas derive from two primary experiences: shock and pain. Shock, often pre-affective, precedes emotions such as fear or anger and can take different forms (implosive, impact). When it dissipates, a deep pain emerges, linked to loneliness, rejection, and existential emptiness. DBR aims to slow down the shock-pain-affect sequence, separating its components to reduce emotional overload and promote regulation. This allows pathological beliefs of unworthiness to be reworked and contradictory attachment patterns to be addressed. The therapy also addresses dissociative symptoms, differentiated into supracortical, intracortical, neurochemical, and structural forms, reducing fragmentation of the self. In conclusion, DBR hypothesizes that attachment traumas result from alterations in midbrain mechanisms of orientation and affective regulation, compromising attachment development, mentalization, and self-esteem.

Indexed as

attachment traumachildhood maltreatmentDeep Brain Reorienting (DBR)

Identifiers

PMID41230360
PMCPMC12603924

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.