ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Attachment Trauma Re-Viewed: A Commentary on Farina and Schimmenti (2025a).
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuing the Conversation for a Clinical Conceptualization of Attachment Trauma.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Farina and Schimmenti (2025a) have made a major contribution to furthering our understanding of early developmental trauma and its serious, long-term, psychosocial effects, while pointing toward therapeutic approaches deeply informed by their rich conceptualization of attachment trauma (AT) and clinical acumen. The authors' impressive review and integration of a wealth of developmental and clinical research has led them to propose a sophisticated yet clear definition of AT, as well as important notions on its relationship with disorganized attachment (DA) and a helicopter view on its treatment. We identify several appreciations of the authors' conceptualization and applications to clinical practice; offer suggestions for further clarification and expansion of ideas; and finally propose how we might "continue the conversation" with an emphasis on clinical theory and practice, past, present, and future. Farina and Schimmenti are to be strongly commended for providing a solid foundation from which to pursue, with greater clarity and intention, our field's ever-deepening and hope-engendering understanding and treatment of survivors of AT, for patients, therapists, and concerned loved ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.