ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Overcoming the Brain-Body Disconnect Following Attachment Trauma: A Comment on Farina and Schimmenti.
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuing the Conversation for a Clinical Conceptualization of Attachment Trauma.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Farina and Schimmenti's (2025) model of Attachment Trauma (AT) reframes early relational adversity as a transdiagnostic, developmentally rooted process that disrupts emotional regulation, identity formation, and relational functioning. Rather than viewing trauma as a single catastrophic event, their model emphasizes chronic, inescapable relational disruptions, particularly in protection, attunement, and repair as core pathogenic mechanisms. This relationally situated view positions AT as a primary etiological force behind a range of clinical conditions, including complex PTSD, borderline personality disorder, and dissociative disorders. To strengthen this compelling framework, the current paper proposes the integration of somatosensory processing models, which offer neurobiologically grounded mechanisms for how AT becomes embedded neurobiologically. Dysregulation in vestibular and somatosensory systems, critical to bodily orientation, interoception, affect regulation, and social connection, may underlie the fragmentation and dissociation central to AT. A hierarchical neurobiological model is proposed, mapping disruptions from brainstem sensory circuits through limbic and cortical systems. A key implication of this model is the need to prioritize physiological regulation before initiating higher-order cognitive or relational interventions. Bottom-up approaches, including sensorimotor psychotherapy, somatic experiencing, and Deep Brain Reorienting (DBR) target shock, autonomic dysregulation and sensory fragmentation that can compromise traditional talk-based therapy. By stabilizing the nervous system and restoring sensorimotor integration, these methods prepare clients for deeper therapeutic work and support the reorganization of disrupted self and relational patterns inherent in attachment trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.