Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230370›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025

Overcoming the Brain-Body Disconnect Following Attachment Trauma: A Comment on Farina and Schimmenti.

Ruth A Lanius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ruth A LaniusDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroscience University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farina and Schimmenti's (2025) model of Attachment Trauma (AT) reframes early relational adversity as a transdiagnostic, developmentally rooted process that disrupts emotional regulation, identity formation, and relational functioning. Rather than viewing trauma as a single catastrophic event, their model emphasizes chronic, inescapable relational disruptions, particularly in protection, attunement, and repair as core pathogenic mechanisms. This relationally situated view positions AT as a primary etiological force behind a range of clinical conditions, including complex PTSD, borderline personality disorder, and dissociative disorders. To strengthen this compelling framework, the current paper proposes the integration of somatosensory processing models, which offer neurobiologically grounded mechanisms for how AT becomes embedded neurobiologically. Dysregulation in vestibular and somatosensory systems, critical to bodily orientation, interoception, affect regulation, and social connection, may underlie the fragmentation and dissociation central to AT. A hierarchical neurobiological model is proposed, mapping disruptions from brainstem sensory circuits through limbic and cortical systems. A key implication of this model is the need to prioritize physiological regulation before initiating higher-order cognitive or relational interventions. Bottom-up approaches, including sensorimotor psychotherapy, somatic experiencing, and Deep Brain Reorienting (DBR) target shock, autonomic dysregulation and sensory fragmentation that can compromise traditional talk-based therapy. By stabilizing the nervous system and restoring sensorimotor integration, these methods prepare clients for deeper therapeutic work and support the reorganization of disrupted self and relational patterns inherent in attachment trauma.

Indexed as

adultattachmentchilddevelopmental traumaemotion regulation

Identifiers

PMID41230370
PMCPMC12603933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.