ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Continuing the Conversation for a Clinical Conceptualization of Attachment Trauma.
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper responds to expert commentaries on our original formulation of attachment trauma. By synthesizing the commentators' critical perspectives, we refine the conceptual boundaries of attachment trauma, elaborate the mechanisms of therapeutic change, and discuss the need for an integrated model that spans phenomenology, neuro‑somatic dynamics, narrative emergence, existential motivation, and ethical co‑presence in clinical settings. We examine how rupture and repair manifest in clinical interaction, the role of somatic co‑regulation in reshaping neural attractors, the emergence of patient narratives as both symptom and remedy, the existential motivations driving attachment and defense, and the ethical imperative of clinical presence with individuals exposed to child maltreatment. We believe that further developing this dialogue may advance a scientifically rigorous yet deeply human approach to assessment and intervention for attachment trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.