Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41230372›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025

Traumatic Developments: Towards an Increasingly Integrated Conceptualization.

Maria Paola Boldrini, Giovanni Tagliavini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria Paola BoldriniPsychologist and Psychotherapist; ESTD president (European Society for Trauma and Dissociation), Modena, Italy. E-mail: mpboldrini@gmail.com.
Giovanni TagliaviniPsychiatrist and Psychotherapist; Founder and Past President AISTED (Italian Association for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation), Milano, Italy. E-mail: giotagliavini@yahoo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farina and Schimmenti's proposal, which directs attention in the field of complex trauma treatment toward the central role of attachment trauma (AT), is both timely and highly valuable. Their contribution immediately invites deeper reflection and gives rise to two distinct sets of questions. The first concerns issues of diagnostic assessment: how can clinicians reliably identify and differentiate the specific features of attachment trauma within the broader spectrum of complex trauma presentations? The second pertains to the future development of clinical practice and research, calling for renewed efforts aimed at integrating this promising AT-oriented perspective into the broader domains of case formulation and conceptualization. Such integration could refine our diagnostic tools and expand the theoretical and practical frameworks through which complex trauma is understood and treated.

Indexed as

attachment traumapsychological traumapsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID41230372
PMCPMC12603934

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.