ReviewFood science & nutrition2025
Evidence-Based Behavioral Interventions to Improve the Double-Duty Actions Impacting the Dual Burden of Malnutrition: A Scoping Review.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-Based Behavioral Interventions to Improve the Double-Duty Actions Impacting the Dual Burden of Malnutrition: A Scoping Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are three double-duty actions that prevent both stunting and obesity, the dual burden of malnutrition, that can be implemented at health clinics worldwide. They are breastfeeding, young child nutrition, and antenatal care and women's nutrition. There is no scoping review that provides a summary of evidence-based interventions that increase the double-duty actions. Inclusion criteria included articles from 2010 to 2024, included interventions to improve breastfeeding, young child nutrition, and antenatal care, did not restrict the intervention to supplementation alone, and were set in sub-Saharan Africa or Asia. Using keyword search across platforms, two reviewers screened abstracts, full papers, conducted and validated data extraction using Covidence. Thirty-six studies were included in the final analysis. Interventions included facility-based and community-based education and mentoring. The interventions successfully recruited pregnant women and women with young children in community settings. The most promising practices for successfully increasing breastfeeding best practices, young child nutrition, and antenatal care included training of health extension workers and peer mentors to support education and social support through community-based women's groups and home visiting. Implementation science methods should be explored for context-specific adaptation and implementation.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.