ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
Prevalence and prediction of masked uncontrolled hypertension in patients recently hospitalized for myocardial infarction.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To study the prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH) in patients recently hospitalized for myocardial infarction, and to develop machine learning-based prediction models identifying MUCH. Methods and results: Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) was performed in 99 patients following hospitalization for a myocardial infarction. Sixty-two clinical variables were eligible for machine learning. Variable importance for the prediction of MUCH (office blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg at ABPM start but mean 24-h blood pressure ≥130/80 mm Hg) was assessed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and the Boruta algorithms. Logistic regression, LASSO, and random forest models based on the top variables were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) in repeated cross-validation. Mean age was 62.1 ± 8.2 years, 73 (74%) were males. The ABPM was performed at a median of 11 weeks after discharge. Among 96 patients with valid 24-h ABPM recordings, 32 (33%) had 24-h mean blood pressure ≥130/80 mm Hg and 17 (18%) were identified with MUCH. Machine learning identified discharge diagnoses of diabetes and hypertension, and kidney dysfunction as most important predictors of MUCH. The best random forest, logistic regression, and LASSO models showed mean AUC 0.82, 0.80, and 0.80, respectively, for prediction of MUCH. Conclusion: One in five patients had MUCH at follow-up after a myocardial infarction. The readily available variables diabetes, hypertension, and kidney dysfunction were identified as the most important predictors of MUCH, which may be implemented in a prediction model for identifying this clinically challenging blood pressure phenotype. Previous presentation: Preliminary results were presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress in London 2024 as an oral abstract presentation. Hellqvist H, Erlinge D, Lindahl B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.