ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Reimagining Mental Health with Artificial Intelligence: Early Detection, Personalized Care, and a Preventive Ecosystem.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of crocin on anxiety, depression, and hippocampal BDNF expression in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Exploring Students' Perceptions and Usage of Artificial Intelligence in Supporting Mental Health: A Preliminary Study in Higher Education in Qatar.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal EEG and explainable machine learning characterize neuroticism-related neurodynamic heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment during visuospatial working memory.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- The role of artistic creativity in predicting difficulties in emotion regulation and reducing social anxiety: insights from a cross-sectional analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rising prevalence of mental disorders, coupled with limited access to mental health services, underscores the urgent need for innovative solutions. Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential in managing mental health conditions through multimodal data analysis. Objective: This study explores emerging applications of AI in early detection, personalized treatment, and the prevention of symptom escalation in mental disorders. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using comprehensive searches of PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore databases (2015-2025). Selected sources included studies on natural language processing (NLP), deep learning, and the analysis of multimodal data (eg, voice, text, and biosensor inputs). A qualitative synthesis was employed to identify key patterns, challenges, and innovations. Findings: AI enhances early detection through concepts such as a "psychological digital signature" and reports high performance in some studies (reported accuracies vary widely, eg, up to ~91% in selected cohorts). However, many high-accuracy reports derive from single-site or limited datasets with variable external validation; therefore, these figures should be interpreted cautiously. We discuss study-specific limitations (sample size, validation methods, and population diversity) in the Methods and Critical Appraisal sections. Conclusion: AI provides a patient-centered, preventive framework for reimagining mental health care. However, its effective integration requires robust ethical standards and digital infrastructure. Ethical considerations are critically linked to clinical implementation, particularly regarding privacy, fairness, and transparency in AI-assisted decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.