ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Artificial Intelligence Prediction of Postoperative Rotation Stability After Toric Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optic disc morphology and myopia severity in eyes with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to predict postoperative toric implantable collamer lens (TICL) rotation and its effect on refraction and vision using artificial intelligence (AI) models. Methods: Data from 642 eyes from 371 patients undergoing TICL surgery were included. Regression models predicted rotation degrees, and classification models predicted rotation-related residual astigmatism, visual acuity loss, or the need for realignment surgery. Regression tasks were evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R²), while classification tasks were assessed by accuracy and mean area under the curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were conducted for low, medium, and high astigmatism. The cutoff value for rotation affecting astigmatism or visual acuity was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Tabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN) was the most accurate regression model for predicting postoperative rotation, achieving RMSE (10.672 ± 5.880) and mean absolute error (5.643 ± 2.328) compared to traditional models. For predicting rotation-related complications, TabPFN consistently achieved the highest accuracy across all secondary outcomes (0.906-0.981), particularly excelling in realignment surgery prediction with near-perfect precision (0.990 ± 0.006) and the highest AUC (0.900 ± 0.078). Cutoff values were 7.50° (AUC = 0.65), 4.50° (AUC = 0.68), and 2.50° (AUC = 0.73) for residual astigmatism and 9.50° (AUC = 0.72), 7.50° (AUC = 0.80), and 4.50° (AUC = 0.93) for visual acuity loss in low, medium, and high astigmatism groups, respectively. Conclusions: AI models effectively predict postoperative rotation stability, providing valuable references for ophthalmologists. Translational Relevance: This study investigated the quantitative relationship between rotation, astigmatism, and vision, bridging the gap between artificial intelligence and optical theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.