Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41231469›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2025

Interventional Treatment vs Conservative Management of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Heze Han, Yu Chen, Li Ma, Hengwei Jin, Dezhi Gao, Zhipeng Li, Ruinan Li, Haibin Zhang, Kexin Yuan, Anqi Li and 14 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Heze HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Li MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hengwei JinDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dezhi GaoDepartment of Gamma-Knife Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhipeng LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ruinan LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Haibin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kexin YuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Anqi LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tengfei YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qinghui ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chengzhuo WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yukun ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University International Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Debin YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Shanxi, China.
Xiaofeng ChaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Zhengfeng LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Qinzhou, Guangxi, China.
Youxiang LiDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shibin SunDepartment of Gamma-Knife Center, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuanli ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaolin ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuo WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Multimodality Treatment for Brain Arteriovenous Malformation in Mainland China (MATCH) Registry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The optimal management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains controversial, as the risk-benefit balance between interventional treatment and conservative management is unclear. While ARUBA (A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain AVMs) favored conservative management in the short term, methodologic limitations and limited follow-up have left uncertainty regarding long-term outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the association between interventional treatment and hemorrhage-free survival, compared with conservative management, in patients with unruptured AVMs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a target trial emulation approach based on data from the Multimodality Treatment for Brain Arteriovenous Malformation in Mainland China (MATCH) registry, a nationwide, multicenter prospective collaboration conducted from August 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. Patients with unruptured AVMs at baseline were included. Data analyses were conducted from January 24 to April 6, 2025. Exposures: Interventional treatment (microsurgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, endovascular embolization, or combinations thereof) initiated within 6 months of diagnosis vs conservative management (observation and medical therapy). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 5-year hemorrhage-free survival, defined as survival without AVM-related hemorrhage or death. The secondary outcome was 10-year hemorrhage-free survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) and risk differences were estimated using inverse probability of censoring-weighted survival analyses following a clone-censor-weight approach. Results: Among the 1770 patients included in the analysis (median age, 26.2 [IQR, 16.5-37.6] years; 1059 [59.8%] male), the estimated 5-year hemorrhage-free survival was 96.23% (95% CI, 93.95%-97.65%) for the interventional treatment group and 89.00% (95% CI, 86.37%-91.24%) for the conservative management group, yielding a risk difference of 7.23% (95% CI, 4.78%-9.91%) and an HR for hemorrhage of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.33-0.57). At 10 years, the risk difference was 8.37% (95% CI, 2.68%-15.70%) and the HR was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.42-0.69). Subgroup analyses indicated that the benefit of the intervention was not observed in patients with high-grade AVMs or diffuse nidus, for whom outcomes were similar to those of patients with conservative management. Only microsurgical resection was consistently associated with reduced hemorrhage risk in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationwide cohort study using target trial emulation, interventional treatment of unruptured AVMs was associated with improved hemorrhage-free survival at 5 and 10 years. These findings support individualized decision-making in the management of unruptured AVMs and demonstrate how target trial emulation can inform clinical questions where randomized clinical trials are not feasible.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentEmbolization, TherapeuticIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiosurgeryRegistriesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41231469
PMCPMC12616460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.