ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2026
Development of Entebbe Bat Virus Reverse Genetics System and Phenotypic Evaluation of Rescued Virus Reveals Host-Specific Replication Patterns in Mosquitoes.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Entebbe bat virus (ENTV) is a bat-associated flavivirus with no known arthropod vector. Research into the biology of this virus, including assessment of the possibility that it may be vector-transmitted, is hindered by a lack of molecular tools and robust genetic systems. Therefore, the complete 3' untranslated region, which was not previously available, was sequenced, and an infectious clone of ENTV was developed to facilitate further investigation of the virus. Virus derived from the clone replicated similarly to the parental virus isolate in various vertebrate cells. Surprisingly, ENTV replicated to high titers in the Aedes aegypti (Ae. aegypti) and Aedes albopictus (Ae. albopictus) mosquito cell lines, but there was no replication or infection in Culex tarsalis cells. In addition, phylogenetic and bioinformatics analyses strongly suggested that ENTV may be associated with a mosquito host. Given the bioinformatics support and efficient growth in Aedes cells, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus were orally exposed to ENTV to evaluate infection. The ENTV blood-fed mosquitoes were all negative for infection; however, when ENTV was intrathoracically (IT) inoculated, bypassing the initial midgut infection and escape barriers, it replicated to high levels in the body without disseminating infectious virus into the saliva. These findings suggest that despite demonstrating high molecular compatibility at the cellular level in Aedes mosquitoes, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus are unlikely to serve as competent vectors for ENTV transmission because of strong midgut infection barriers. The clone presented in this manuscript should help clarify the mechanisms for transmission and maintenance of ENTV, which remain poorly understood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.