ArticleScientific reports2025
Pharmacovigilance analysis of myopathy associated with azoles and nonstatins interactions based on US FAERS database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Azoles are first-line antifungal agents known to increase the risk of statin-related myopathy due to drug interactions. However, myopathy events have also been observed in patients using azoles without concurrent statin use, suggesting that azoles may be linked to an increased risk of non-statin-related myopathy. Based on data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), this study aimed to determine whether azoles are associated with a disproportionately high incidence of myopathy after excluding statin-related reports and to explore the potential contribution of interactions between azoles and nonstatins. We used Open Vigil 2.1 to conduct a disproportionality analysis based on data from the FAERS from Q1 2004 to Q2 2023. We excluded reports with at least one statin. Myopathy was defined based on a Standardized MedDRA Query (SMQ). Five azoles were screened. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) information components (ICs) were used for disproportionality analysis. Subset analysis and the Ω shrinkage measure model were used to detect drug‒drug interaction (DDI) signals. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted. In the nonstatin dataset, we identified 215 cases of myopathy associated with azole use. Notably, 50.5% of the reports involved voriconazole among East Asian patients. Voriconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole were associated with myopathy in narrow and broad SMQ searches. Posaconazole and isavuconazole were associated with myopathy in the broad SMQ search. Forty-two potential DDIs between azoles and nonstatins were identified. A literature review identified 12 related cases. Azoles, particularly voriconazole in East Asian populations, are associated with an increased reporting frequency of myopathy events in the absence of statin use. DDIs with some nonstatins further elevate this frequency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.