ArticleScientific reports2025
Tracing the dynamic interplay of benefit finding, self-management efficacy, and social support in gynecological cancer patients: a longitudinal study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological capital in patients with cancer: A qualitative study based on cognitive adaptation theory.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Influencing factors and mediating effects of advanced medical care plan readiness in young and middle-aged patients with advanced cancer based on machine learning.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Mapping the Patient Journey of Oral Microbiota Transplantation During Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- A network analysis of benefit finding, posttraumatic growth, anxiety, and depression in breast cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aimed to (1) investigate the levels and dynamic changes of benefit finding (BF) in gynecological cancer patients at baseline (T0), 3-month follow-up (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2); (2) To explore the latent trajectory classes of BF using a latent class growth model; (3) To examine the dynamic relationship between BF trajectory classes, self-management efficacy, and social support. A longitudinal study. At the initial survey, participants completed questionnaires including a general demographic survey, the Chinese version of the benefit finding scale, cancer self-management efficacy scale, and social support rating scale. Follow-up data, excluding the general demographic survey, were collected at the 3 and 6 month. Statistical analyses was performed using SPSS 29.0 and Mplus 8.3. (1) The BF levels among gynecological cancer patients were moderate within the 6-month follow-up period, showing an increasing trend over time. (2) Three BF trajectory groups were identified: high stable growth group (41.1%), moderate stable growth group (45.6%), and a low continuous growth group (13.3%). (3) A dynamic relationship was observed between BF trajectory classes, self-management efficacy, and social support: patients in the high stable growth group showed continuous increases in self-management efficacy and social support over time, maintaining high levels; patients in the low continuous growth group experienced significant growth in social support. Overall, BF in gynecological cancer patients remained at a moderate level during the 6-month follow-up, showing an upward trend over time. There was heterogeneity in BF trajectories, and the trajectory categories of BF were dynamically related to self-management efficacy and social support. This study provides that latent trajectory classes of benefit finding, self-management efficacy, and social support in gynecological cancer patients. It can be used for the identification of patients with moderate to low levels of BF. The findings suggest that healthcare providers should tailor interventions based on the patient's stage and trajectory group to better understand and meet psychological needs, alleviate negative emotions, and improve quality of life. This study is reported using the STROBE guidelines. No patient or public engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.