ArticleScientific reports2025
An international 20 country patient and physician survey of the usability and acceptability of Stepped Care pathway in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential for distinguishing the parkinsonian subtype of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease: a three-dimensional gait analysis study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is not a single condition and has multiple heterogeneous presentations with several endophenotypes as well as collateral factors affecting care and health. However, clinical consultations globally often miss these important aspects in clinic. The Stepped Care pathway of care was developed from PD patients' opinion and attempts to combine these gaps in care in a simple 3-stage clinical paradigm. We conducted a survey across twenty (20) countries to explore the views of clinicians and PD patients on the process, acceptability and need of the Stepped Care pathway. A structured questionnaire was administered in both affluent and under-resourced clinics, capturing data from a multi-ethnic and diverse patient base. 99% patients (White, Asian and Black) felt Stepped Care toolkit asked relevant questions addressing needs and concerns in PD care that are often missed, and 96% agreed with the importance of using this toolkit during Outpatient Clinic visits. Moreover, a significant majority of PD patients (96%) felt Stepped Care makes them understand their condition better. 92% of clinicians indicated that the Stepped care toolkit could be an effective asset in clinical practice, while 91% of clinicians agreed that the toolkit provides holistic care which is often missed in clinic. This novel global survey of the efficacy and useability of Stepped Care for PD is overwhelmingly endorsed by PD patients and clinicians from a diverse, multi-ethnic background across high- and low- income countries. Stepped Care can be used in clinical practice in order to ensure a holistic and comprehensive care for PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.