ArticleScientific reports2025
Therapeutic efficacy of rehmannioside A on 5×FAD mice in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD), characterized by Aβ plaques and cognitive decline, remains a significant therapeutic challenge due to limited efficacy of current pharmacotherapies, while Rehmannioside A (ReA) has shown promising neuroprotective effects against neurodegenerative diseases. This research focuses on investigating the therapeutic effects of ReA on 5×FAD mice, emphasizing its potential application in AD treatment. The 5×FAD mice were divided into experimental groups and treated with ReA at varied dosages or donepezil for a twelve-week continuous treatment period. A series of evaluation methods, including behavioral tests, histopathological analysis, Western blotting, and measurement of oxidative and inflammatory markers, were implemented. The findings demonstrated that optimal ReA doses significantly improved learning, memory, and cognitive functions in 5×FAD mice, reduced Aβ plaque accumulation in the hippocampus, decreased microglial cell counts, increased PSD 95 and synapsin-1 protein expression, mitigated oxidative stress and inflammation, and showed no harmful effects on liver or kidney function. ReA's diverse biological activities suggest its potential in reducing neural damage. More extensive studies are needed to fully understand its molecular mechanisms in AD, which could lead to the development of innovative and effective treatments for this severe neurodegenerative condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.