ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a reliable mouse model for caudal epidural anesthesia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epidural anesthesia is frequently used for pain management during surgery and childbirth. However, a persistent issue is fever induced by epidural anesthesia, a common complication in clinical settings, for which effective countermeasures are lacking. Developing a reliable mouse model is crucial for investigating the underlying mechanisms. This study focuses on developing a reproducible technique for administering caudal epidural anesthesia in mice. Male ddY mice were administered 0.25% ropivacaine in volumes of 50, 100, or 150 µL into the epidural space. Successful epidural puncture was confirmed by the presence of blue dye in the epidural space. Anesthetic effects were compared using the formalin test. Epidural success rates ranged from 45.5% to 63.6%, with the highest success in the 100 µL group. The lowest success rate was observed in the 50 µL group. The formalin test showed stable analgesia with 100 µL, while 150 µL produced a broader anesthetic effect but increased mortality. To address the anatomical and technical challenges of precise needle placement in small animals, we successfully performed caudal epidural anesthesia in mice by optimizing the puncture posture using a stereotaxic apparatus. Administration of 100 µL of 0.25% ropivacaine provided stable analgesia with minimal side effects. This technique is a valuable tool for studying the neurophysiological and mechanistic aspects of epidural anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.