ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2026
Stem cell-mediated recovery in stroke: partnering with the immune system.
Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells therapy for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of mouse models.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- M2 microglia-derived migrasome-enriched extracellular vesicles restore mitochondrial homeostasis to orchestrate neurovascular unit recovery after ischemic stroke.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- The relationship between social frailty and self-care ability in elderly stroke patients: the mediating role of self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Stem cell therapy for stroke: mechanisms, clinical translation, and future perspectives.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke remains a leading cause of disability owing to the irreversible neuronal loss that it causes and the limited regenerative capacity of the CNS. Although reperfusion therapies such as thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy can restore blood flow after stroke, their stringent eligibility criteria leave many patients without treatment options. The immune response, involving complex interactions between brain-resident and peripheral immune cells, has a critical role in stroke recovery. Stem cell-based therapies, particularly those involving neural stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells, may be able to reshape the inflammatory microenvironment after stroke, mitigating secondary injury and promoting tissue repair. However, the precise mechanisms driving their effects remain incompletely understood, hindering clinical translation. In this Review, we highlight the bidirectional crosstalk between stem cells and immune cells (including microglia, T cells and peripheral immune cells) and discuss how these interactions influence neuroinflammation, neural plasticity and circuit remodelling in stroke recovery. We examine key determinants of stem cell therapy efficacy, emphasizing the role of stem cell-immune cell interactions, and discuss targeted strategies to enhance immune modulation and neuroprotection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.