ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Computational Modeling of Patient-Specific Healing and Deformation Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Surgery Based on MRI Data.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer, offering recurrence and survival rates comparable to mastectomy while preserving healthy breast tissue. However, surgical cavity healing post-BCS often leads to highly variable tissue remodeling, including scar tissue formation and contracture, leading to visible breast deformation or asymmetry. These outcomes significantly impact patient quality of life but are difficult to predict due to the complex interplay between biologic healing processes and individual patient variability. To address this challenge, we extended our calibrated computational mechanobiological model of post-BCS healing by incorporating diagnostic imaging data to evaluate how patient-specific breast and tumor characteristics influence healing trajectories and deformation.
methodsThe model captured multi-scale biologic and biomechanical processes, including fibroblast activity, collagen remodeling, and nonlinear tissue mechanics, to simulate time-dependent tissue remodeling. Patient-specific breast and tumor geometries from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were integrated into finite element simulations of cavity healing, whose outputs trained Gaussian process surrogate models for rapid prediction of healing dynamics and breast surface deformation across diverse patient profiles.
resultsThese models revealed how factors including breast density, cavity volume, breast volume, and cavity depth influence post-surgical cavity contraction and measures of breast surface deformation.
conclusionThis framework has the potential to provide a personalized, predictive tool for surgical planning and decision-making, enabling clinicians and patients to anticipate healing trajectories and cosmetic outcomes, with the goal of optimizing surgical results and enhancing patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.