ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Evaluation of CNN-based deep learning models for auto-contouring in glioblastoma radiotherapy: a review.
Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in radiation treatment planning: a narrative review from automation to clinical decision support.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Mapping knowledge landscapes and emerging trends in artificial intelligence in glioblastoma: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Radiation therapy (RT) plays a main role in GBM treatment, with precise tumor volume delineation. Tumor contouring is important in RT treatment planning, followed by successful treatment. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL) techniques, have introduced automated contouring methods to improve accuracy and reduce interobserver variability. This review considers different architectures such as CNN, U-Net, nnU-Net, and PKMI-Net. In addition, a comparison was made between recent advances in DL models for the automatic segmentation of GBM target volumes, focusing on more applicable architectures and their characteristics, challenges, and limitations. This review study was performed on the recent literature from scientific citation websites such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science by the end of January 2025. The results of this review study among the analyzed models, nnU-Net architecture emerged as the strongest, offering superior segmentation accuracy due to its self-configuring capabilities and adaptability to different imaging modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.