ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
Reflections on the impact of the Lived Experience Group in the James Lind Alliance Palliative and End of Life Care Priority Setting Partnership Refresh.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2025, Marie Curie and other partners launched the results of a refreshed Priority Setting Partnership with the James Lind Alliance, to identify priorities for palliative and end of life care research, based on the views of people affected by serious life limiting illness. To our knowledge, this was the first Priority Setting Partnership to have a dedicated group of people with lived experience as equal partners in the research. This paper provides reflections for other researchers considering embedding a Lived Experience Group into future Priority Setting Partnerships and provides evidence of the positive impact that this can bring. MAIN TEXT: Data on involvement impact and experience was collected using the Public Involvement in Research Toolkit (PIRIT), semi-structured interviews with Lived Experience Group and Steering Group members, and a short online survey for Lived Experience Group participants. The PIRIT tracker recorded 66 impacts throughout the project, which included shaping the project, refining data collection tools, influencing language, encouraging diverse responses, and aiding dissemination.
conclusionsForming a Lived Experience Group to support the refresh of the Palliative and End of Life Care Priority Setting Partnership ensured that people with lived experience of dying, death and bereavement had a clear route for involvement in all stages of the project. This regular and consistent engagement required considerable resource but shaped the project in several ways and ultimately improved its quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.