ReviewGut and liver2025
Prevention, Detection, and Management of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.
Review in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 11.5-Fr Large-Bore Plastic Stents Versus Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metallic Stents for the Management of Preoperative Endoscopic Biliary Obstruction in Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Imaging and management of biliary complications after biliary interventions.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Article
- Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Pragmatic Clinical Pathway from Periprocedural Prophylaxis to Early Postprocedural Triage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for pancreaticobiliary diseases. However, its relatively invasive nature necessitates a thorough understanding of potential adverse events and appropriate preventive strategies. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), the most common ERCP-related adverse event, occurs in approximately 10% of cases. While often mild, severe cases can rapidly progress and lead to clinical deterioration and mortality. The pathogenesis of PEP involves direct tissue injury, impaired ductal drainage, inflammatory mediator release, and individual susceptibility. These insights have informed the currently employed prevention and management strategies. PEP risk factors include both patient- and procedure-related variables, underscoring the need for precise risk stratification and individualized procedural planning. Evidence-based preventive strategies-such as rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prophylactic pancreatic stent placement, aggressive intravenous hydration, guidewire-assisted cannulation, and other pharmacologic agents-have demonstrated efficacy in reducing PEP incidence. Future developments, including optimal combination strategies and machine learning-based risk prediction models, may further improve outcomes. Significantly reducing the burden of PEP requires integrating mechanistic insight and risk stratification with timely, evidence-based prevention and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.