Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234031›Full record

ReviewGut and liver2025

Prevention, Detection, and Management of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Huapyong Kang, Chang Hwan Park, Kihyun Ryu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huapyong KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-0809
Chang Hwan ParkPolicy-Quality Management Committee, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2995-8779
Kihyun RyuPolicy-Quality Management Committee, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-6776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for pancreaticobiliary diseases. However, its relatively invasive nature necessitates a thorough understanding of potential adverse events and appropriate preventive strategies. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), the most common ERCP-related adverse event, occurs in approximately 10% of cases. While often mild, severe cases can rapidly progress and lead to clinical deterioration and mortality. The pathogenesis of PEP involves direct tissue injury, impaired ductal drainage, inflammatory mediator release, and individual susceptibility. These insights have informed the currently employed prevention and management strategies. PEP risk factors include both patient- and procedure-related variables, underscoring the need for precise risk stratification and individualized procedural planning. Evidence-based preventive strategies-such as rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prophylactic pancreatic stent placement, aggressive intravenous hydration, guidewire-assisted cannulation, and other pharmacologic agents-have demonstrated efficacy in reducing PEP incidence. Future developments, including optimal combination strategies and machine learning-based risk prediction models, may further improve outcomes. Significantly reducing the burden of PEP requires integrating mechanistic insight and risk stratification with timely, evidence-based prevention and management.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradePancreatitisPostoperative ComplicationsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStentsAnti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidalCholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrogradeFluid therapyPancreatitisStents

Identifiers

PMID41234031
PMCPMC12616144

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.