ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Trends in the cost of ovarian cancer across phases of care and surgical years in Korea.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to estimate the medical costs among patients with ovarian cancer across distinct phases of care and surgical years.
methodsThis population-based retrospective cohort study identified newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients who underwent surgery based on nationwide claims data from Korea (2012-2019). Medical costs were categorized into 5 phases: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, frontline chemotherapy, monitoring, and recurrence. Total and cancer-related costs were analyzed by surgical year on a per patient and per patient per month (PPPM) basis. Per patient costs were estimated for each phase, with up to one year of follow-up per phase, for patients identified between 2013 and 2016. Generalized linear models (GLMs) examined associations between surgical year and cancer-related costs.
resultsAmong 10,594 patients, median cancer-related costs per patient were highest in the recurrent phase ($20,548), followed by the frontline chemotherapy ($7,005), neoadjuvant chemotherapy ($5,870), surgery ($4,965), and monitoring phases ($1,906). The median surgery phase costs per patient increased from $4,254 in 2013 to $5,676 in 2016; recurrent phase costs increased from $17,289 to $26,750. GLM analysis revealed that per patient and PPPM costs significantly increased over time, particularly in the surgery and recurrent phases. Compared with the cost per patient in 2013, the cost per patient in 2016 was 27% higher for the surgery phase and 49% higher for the recurrent phase.
conclusionOvarian cancer-related costs have significantly increased over time, especially in the surgery and recurrent phases, thus highlighting the growing economic burden and the need for cost-effective care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.