ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
From traditional metabolic markers to ensemble learning: comparative application of machine learning models for predicting NAFLD risk in adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasingly prevalent among adolescents and poses a significant public health challenge. Due to limitations in imaging and invasive diagnostic methods such as liver biopsy, there is a pressing need for accurate, cost-effective, and non-invasive risk prediction tools. This study aims to develop and compare multiple machine learning (ML) models to predict NAFLD risk in adolescents using routine anthropometric and laboratory data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2020 dataset. Methods: Data from 2,132 U.S. adolescents (NHANES 2011-2020) were analyzed. Nine machine learning (ML) models were developed using features selected by Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Performance was assessed by AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and calibration. The Extra Trees (ET) model was further compared with TyG-based logistic regression models. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and an interactive online prediction tool was deployed. Results: NAFLD prevalence was 13.0%. The ET model achieved the best overall performance (AUC = 0.784, ACC = 0.773, Kappa = 0.320), outperforming other ML algorithms and TyG-based models, which showed higher sensitivity but poorer precision. SHAP analysis identified waist circumference, triglycerides, insulin, and HDL as key predictors, revealing nonlinear threshold effects. The online tool allows individualized risk estimation based on routine clinical variables. Conclusion: The ET-based ML model provides an accurate and interpretable approach for adolescent NAFLD risk prediction. By surpassing traditional metabolic indicators and offering an accessible web-based calculator, it supports scalable, cost-effective early screening and targeted prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.