SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Comparative effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and incretin-based therapies on dementia risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Irisin upregulation as a contributory mechanism for the therapeutic benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Review
- A convergence of global epidemics: diabetes as a modulator of neurodegenerative and neuro-inflammatory disorders.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Dapagliflozin and cognitive impairment: pharmacological mechanisms, translational evidence, and future directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antidiabetic drugs lower blood glucose levels and may also have neuroprotective and vascular protection effects. In particular, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and incretin mimetics have demonstrated dementia-reducing effects. We evaluated whether SGLT2is reduce dementia risk compared with incretin mimetics in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through February 2025. Both randomized trials and cohort studies were identified and qualitatively assessed, but only cohort studies were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. We also compared the effects of SGLT2is with those of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) on dementia incidence. Results: Nine studies were identified for analysis. Compared with incretin mimetics, SGLT2is significantly reduced the overall dementia risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91], and SGLT2is had stronger effects than DPP-4i (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.59-0.77) and GLP-1RA (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00). SGLT2i also reduced the risks of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.70 vs. HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52-0.88, respectively). The results of subgroup analyses revealed increased benefits for patients aged older than 65 years. Empagliflozin was the most consistently protective among the SGLT2i agents. Conclusion: SGLT2is may provide neuroprotective benefits beyond glycemic control in patients with T2D, particularly in older populations at higher risk of cognitive decline. These findings support consideration of SGLT2is as a preferred therapeutic option for patients with T2D at increased risk of dementia, although randomized controlled trials would further strengthen this evidence base. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024567890 identifier PROSPERO (CRD420251037959).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.