Evidence mapPaperPMID 41234279Full record

ReviewJournal of arrhythmia2025

Perspectives on Clinical Biomarkers Based on the Pathophysiology of Arrhythmias.

Tomoya Hara, Masataka Sata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomoya HaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0579-6196
Masataka SataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arrhythmias are diagnosed using electrocardiograms (ECGs). Particularly for paroxysmal arrhythmias, an ECG recorded during an episode is essential for definitive diagnosis. Meanwhile, biomarkers assessable through blood tests do not directly diagnose arrhythmias, but are considered useful for evaluating the prevalence of paroxysmal arrhythmias, predicting their onset, assessing severity, and evaluating the risk of complications. While most biomarker research in the arrhythmia field focuses on atrial fibrillation, several studies have also reported on the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. This paper defines biomarkers as substances measurable and evaluable through blood tests and primarily discusses their relationship with atrial fibrillation and its complications.

Indexed as

arrhythmiaatrial fibrillationcell‐free DNAfibrosisinflammation

Identifiers

PMID41234279
PMCPMC12606446

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.