ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
The potential of microfluidic cell analysis in CAR T cell therapy manufacturing.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing immunity against breast cancer: from checkpoints to cell therapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant success in treating hematological cancers, Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapies must overcome several challenges to become accessible to a wide patient population. With the high cost of treatment stemming partly from the complexity of the manufacturing process, there is a need for radical innovation in the ways those therapies are made. A crucial aspect of the manufacturing process is quality control (QC), responsible for monitoring the quality of the drug product. The use of microfluidic technology, in which microchannels are designed and fabricated to achieve high control of liquids, can increase sensitivity, lower the Limit of Detection (LoD), and improve time-to-result of analytical assays. This review examines how recently developed microfluidic devices for T cell analysis fit the requirements of QC testing in CAR T cell manufacturing. A particular focus is on cell counting, cell phenotyping, and cytotoxicity assessments, where a range of microfluidic approaches have been taken to deliver reliable analytical assays. The review not only highlights current limitations of microfluidic devices that hinder their implementation in manufacturing, but also their potential to expand on current QC testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.