Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234554›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

The potential of microfluidic cell analysis in CAR T cell therapy manufacturing.

Aleksandra Nikoniuk, Koki Lilova, Michael Thomas, Nicolas Szita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aleksandra NikoniukDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Koki LilovaAutolus Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
Michael ThomasDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Nicolas SzitaDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, UCL, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant success in treating hematological cancers, Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapies must overcome several challenges to become accessible to a wide patient population. With the high cost of treatment stemming partly from the complexity of the manufacturing process, there is a need for radical innovation in the ways those therapies are made. A crucial aspect of the manufacturing process is quality control (QC), responsible for monitoring the quality of the drug product. The use of microfluidic technology, in which microchannels are designed and fabricated to achieve high control of liquids, can increase sensitivity, lower the Limit of Detection (LoD), and improve time-to-result of analytical assays. This review examines how recently developed microfluidic devices for T cell analysis fit the requirements of QC testing in CAR T cell manufacturing. A particular focus is on cell counting, cell phenotyping, and cytotoxicity assessments, where a range of microfluidic approaches have been taken to deliver reliable analytical assays. The review not only highlights current limitations of microfluidic devices that hinder their implementation in manufacturing, but also their potential to expand on current QC testing.

Indexed as

CAR T cellcell therapy manufacturingcritical quality attributesmicrofluidicsprocess analytical technologies (PAT)quality control

Identifiers

PMID41234554
PMCPMC12605917

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.