ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025
Evaluating the Role of Clozapine in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: A Narrative Synthesis of Clinical, Economic, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.
Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of clozapine trough level reporting in clinical practice: A four-year retrospective evaluation from India.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Underprescription of Clozapine: A Narrative Review Regarding 'Clozaphobia'.Human psychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Clozapine-Associated Generalized Seizure at Therapeutic Dose Without Prior Epilepsy: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Receiving Clozapine-Based Therapy in South Kalimantan, Indonesia.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) affects up to 30% of individuals with schizophrenia who fail to respond to standard antipsychotics. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on clozapine's clinical effectiveness, economic impact, and quality-of-life benefits. A nonsystematic literature review of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed using relevant clinical and health-economic keywords. Findings consistently demonstrate that clozapine provides superior symptom reduction, reduces rehospitalization and mortality, and improves functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes. Evidence from real-world studies and meta-analyses shows marked reductions in rehospitalization rates, mortality, and caregiver burden compared with other antipsychotics. Economic analyses confirm that, although clozapine requires ongoing hematologic monitoring, its long-term savings from reduced inpatient care, emergency visits, and indirect productivity losses outweigh these costs, establishing its cost-effectiveness across diverse health-system settings. Despite its proven benefits, clozapine remains underused due to safety concerns, mandatory monitoring, limited prescriber confidence, and infrastructural barriers. Optimizing its use requires early identification of TRS, timely initiation of therapy, individualized monitoring strategies, and close interprofessional collaboration among psychiatrists, pharmacists, and healthcare teams. At the policy level, investment in laboratory infrastructure, subsidized monitoring programs, and the development of locally adapted treatment guidelines are critical to expanding safe, equitable, and sustainable access to clozapine worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.