ReviewTranslational cancer research2025
Advances and challenges in circulating tumor DNA-based early detection of lung cancer.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell transcriptomic analysis identifies a tumor-enriched GIMAP7⁺ CD4⁺ naïve T cell population with a unique immunoregulatory state in lung adenocarcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- PRMT5 is a prognostic-related biomarker associated with the tumor immune microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Epigenetic profiling of circulating cell-free DNA for early detection and minimal residual disease assessment in lung cancer: a focus on DNA methylation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The primary reason for this poor prognosis is late-stage diagnosis, as approximately 50% of lung cancer cases are detected at stage 4 when curative treatment is no longer an option, and the 5-year survival of this stage is approximately 15%. While low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has significantly improved early detection, its high false-positive rate (60-70%) leads to unnecessary invasive procedures and patient anxiety. Therefore, a complementary, highly specific, and non-invasive biomarker is urgently needed. Liquid biopsy, particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool for lung cancer screening. Unlike conventional tissue biopsies, ctDNA-based tests provide a minimally invasive means to detect cancer-specific genomic alterations, including somatic mutations, DNA methylation patterns, somatic copy number alterations (CNAs), and fragment size variations. While ctDNA analysis has demonstrated clinical utility in advanced lung cancer, its application in early-stage disease remains challenging due to the low abundance of ctDNA in circulation. Strategies such as whole-genome methylation profiling, CNA analysis, and fragmentomics have been explored to enhance sensitivity and specificity for early detection. This review summarizes recent advances and challenges in ctDNA-based lung cancer screening, focusing on the strengths and limitations of different approaches. We highlight the need for integrating ctDNA assays with current LDCT screening protocols to improve diagnostic accuracy. Future large-scale prospective studies are essential to validate the clinical utility of ctDNA-based liquid biopsy in early lung cancer detection. A multi-modal biomarker strategy that combines genetic, epigenetic, and structural features holds great promise for transforming lung cancer screening and improving clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.