Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41234872›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Development and validation of a machine learning-based prognostic model using mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes for colorectal cancer patients.

Chang Liu, Yaxuan Li, Jiaxu Song, Yijing Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chang LiuFirst School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yaxuan LiFirst School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiaxu SongFirst School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yijing ZhaoFirst School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a primary cause of cancer-related mortality, necessitating novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. Mitochondrial dysfunction, a hallmark of cancer, drives metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion, but its prognostic potential in CRC has not been fully explored. Deep insights and prognostic models related to mitochondrial dysfunction in CRC are currently lacking. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-based prognostic model using mitochondria-related genes (MRGs) to stratify CRC patients and guide personalized therapy. Methods: RNA sequencing, clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Program containing 473 CRC/41 normal samples, and Gene Expression Omnibus datasets, including GSE39582, GSE38832, and GSE17536, were analyzed. Differential analysis was employed to identify 316 differentially expressed MRGs. Key pathways were screened through functional enrichment analysis. Three ML algorithms and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were utilized to identify prognostic genes. A risk model was developed and validated for overall survival (OS) prediction. Immune infiltration, drug sensitivity, and immunotherapy response were assessed. Results: The 7-gene signature ( Conclusions: This ML-based model using MRGs effectively predicts CRC prognosis, immune microenvironment, and therapeutic response, offering a framework for precision oncology. The 7-gene signature may guide risk stratification and targeted therapy, bridging mitochondrial biology with clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer (CRC)Machine learning (ML)mitochondrial dysfunctionprognostic model

Identifiers

PMID41234872
PMCPMC12605350

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.