SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stromal cells as a promising therapy for ARDS: a systematic review of preclinical studies.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Broad-Spectrum Protective Effects of Lyophilized FE002-Lu Lung Fibroblast Conditioned Medium Against Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Injury in Wistar Rats.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Combined trauma and toxic inhalation in war and disaster medicine: alveolar-capillary barrier failure and respiratory countermeasures.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- The gut-lung axis in ARDS: beyond microbial translocation.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Therapeutic Efficacy and Bioengineering Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Beyond immunomodulation: mechanisms and synergistic strategies of mesenchymal stem cells in promoting alveolar epithelial and endothelial repair in ARDS.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- One syndrome, many diseases: toward precision pharmacotherapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as a promising cell-free therapeutic strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a condition with limited effective treatment options. Methods: This systematic review synthesizes findings from 51 in vivo preclinical studies investigating the efficacy, delivery methods, mechanisms of action, and optimization strategies of MSC-EV interventions in experimental ARDS. Results: Across diverse models and etiologies, MSC-EVs consistently attenuated inflammation, improved gas exchange, and enhanced survival. Mechanistically, these benefits were largely attributed to microRNA-mediated immunomodulation, including promotion of anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotypes and improved bacterial clearance. Factors influencing therapeutic efficacy included the MSC source, EV preconditioning, timing of administration, and route of delivery. Discussion: Despite these encouraging findings, critical methodological heterogeneity limits reproducibility and translational potential. This heterogeneity is particularly evident in dose metrics (e.g., particle number versus protein content), EV quantification methods (e.g., flow cytometry versus nanoparticle tracking analysis), and timing of outcome assessment. This review underscores the growing body of preclinical evidence supporting MSC-EVs in ARDS and identifies key knowledge gaps such as optimal dosing, safety profiling, and scalable manufacturing that must be addressed to enable clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.