SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Traditional Chinese Medicine for childhood obesity: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Chaihu-Wendan Decoction alleviates obesity through PTEN-mediated uncoupling of metabolic signaling and macrophage activation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Childhood obesity is a major global public health concern associated with adverse cardiometabolic outcomes and long-term health risks. While conventional treatments such as diet, exercise, and behavioral therapy remain the cornerstone of management, their long-term effectiveness is often limited. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has been increasingly investigated as an adjunctive approach for pediatric obesity, yet findings from systematic reviews remain fragmented and overlapping. Objective: This umbrella review aimed to synthesize and critically appraise evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) evaluating TCM interventions for childhood obesity, assess methodological quality, and quantify evidence overlap. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted from inception to August 30, 2025. Eligible SRs/MAs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials of TCM interventions in children and adolescents (<19 years) with obesity or overweight. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR-2. Findings were summarized qualitatively by intervention category (herbal medicine, acupuncture/moxibustion, acupressure/massage/cupping, dietary therapy/exercise). Evidence overlap was analyzed using the Corrected Covered Area (CCA). Results: Of 15 records identified, three SRs/MAs met inclusion criteria encompassing 68 unique primary trials. Herbal medicine significantly reduced BMI and body weight compared with lifestyle interventions. Acupuncture and moxibustion improved BMI, weight, waist circumference, total cholesterol, LDL-C, fasting glucose, and TCM syndrome scores, with body acupuncture outperforming auricular acupuncture. Cupping combined with acupressure was the top-ranked therapy for BMI and weight reduction, while chuna massage demonstrated moderate benefits. No serious adverse events were reported across reviews. Methodological quality was rated as moderate or low. Evidence overlap was moderate-to-high. Conclusion: TCM interventions, particularly acupuncture, moxibustion, herbal medicine, and combined physical modalities, appear effective and safe adjuncts for childhood obesity. However, methodological limitations, evidence overlap, and lack of long-term data underscore the need for rigorously designed multicenter RCTs to confirm sustained benefits. Systematic review registration: https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-vnjbw-v1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.